What happens when Hector is driven with net or gross emissions? For the FFI emissions and uptake it turns out that going with net vs gross makes no difference. For luc emissions and uptake running with net or gross emissions does matter a bit, this change is most noticeable in the veg c pool but there is also a 2% change or so in global temp

A comparison of Hector's output with the Global Carbon Budget, with the idea being that differences in LUC emissions could be responsible for the historically low CO2 observations.

Looking into the differences between the CH4 & N2O RF between Hector & IPCC AR6 values.

comparing the new archive vs the old one

Compare what happens when stitching is done with chunked into 5 or 9 periods

before starting the nearest neighbor analysis I wanted to check to see if when we over-lay target and archive data what our coverage looks like.

Annotated materials for the R Hector workshop given at Indiana University

What happens when different met inputs are used to drive the model?

Look at how the length of the disturbance or which pool is disturbed affects ED output.

Results from the first pass at the forte disturbance experiment.

FoRTE disturbance project testing What happens when we remove pines and adjust the UMBS SLA and Vcmax

Taking a look at SLA and Vcmax, how different are the Ed values compared to the UMBS values?

Before getting too deep into the FoRTE ED experiments, I wanted to check to go over the following 1) finalize met inputs 2) come up with a set of consistent outputs/plots to make

Plotting the difference between the air temperature and surface temperature calculated in Hector.

demo of the MCMC for the MENDplus package

Second pass at the uncertainty case study for paper 1, it looks like there are some issues with the way that we constrain the RF values.

First pass at the uncertainty case study for paper 1, it looks like there are some issues with the way that we constrain the RF values.

Could NPP be used to constrain beta and Q10 to prevent them from trading off with one another?

what is up with the relationship between s and diff? are there any patterns?

does changing sigma impact the best fit values

Overview of the concentration driven best fits.

Does the carbon cycle matter? Do we think that Hector results noticeably change with and without the carbon cycle? What happens when we fix q10 and let optim solve for beta?

What happens when we use temperature and heat flux to determine the best fit for Hector to emulate an ESM?

CMIP6 data to download and instructions.

We finally have CMIP5 heat flux data!! whoot whoot!

Does using heat flux data solve our problems with S and diff? I think so!

The purpose of this document is to answer two questions. 1. Do we believe that we are calculating the heat flux from the atmospheric component correctly? 2. Will the noise of the ESM heat flux data be an issue? (Is is larger than the noise from the Hector ensemble)

Let's look at the relationship between diff and S when diff is held constant.

What happens to the single ESM calibration results when I use a better initial parameter guess?

This is my second look at the results from the single ESM calibration. I focused on the following questions. 1. Did it work? (optim convergence = 0) 2. Did adding the volscl parameter do what we thought it would?

I calibrated Hector climate parameters to best emulate the ESM temperature results from the CMIP5 concentration driven experiments. I used CMIP5 model ensemble means as the comparison data. This is just a first pass at looking at the results.