This work was not born from the desire to construct one more model, but from a deeper necessity: to reconcile the language of economics with the lived experience of imbalance. I have tried to build a framework where mathematical structure and moral insight are not adversaries but mirrors of one another. The Dynamic Structural Disequilibrium Economy (DSSDE) is, in this sense, a bridge — between the measurable and the meaningful, between equations and existence. I do not pretend to offer certainty. What I seek is to recover the dignity of doubt, the space where economics becomes again a human science: a way of understanding how inequality, entropy, and the search for coherence define the destiny of societies.