gravatar

JulianeChat

Juliane Vigneault

Recently Published

Table S12 - Landscape observed and resampled prevalence estimated by each sampling method.
All values are given in percentage. N stands for the number of according sampling effort.
Table S13 - Estimated parametric coefficients and approximate significance of smooth terms of the fine-scale prevalence community GAMMs.
The deviance explained (D2) is given for every model as a measure of the model fit.
Figure A1 - Relations entre la longueur et les paramètres d’infection chez les communautés littorales de poissons.
Tableau A1 - Prévalence d’infection de chaque espèce de poisson dans chacun des lacs échantillonnés.
NaN indique qu’aucun individu n’a été observé pour la catégorie correspondante. Les valeurs de prévalence sont présentées en pourcentage.
Table S15 - Host specificity of the black spot disease at landscape-scale according to the different sampling methods.
NaN means that no fish were caught in the corresponding category.
Table S11 - Method comparison of landscape final resampled prevalence estimates (N =35).
Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 1288, p-value = 0. A Benjamini-Hochberg correction is applied on the dunn test.
Table S10 - Observed site-scale fish prevalence estimated by each method. Affiliated lake are given as columns.
All values are given in percentage. Samples with no captures were omitted to alleviate the table. Lake Tracy was not included because only one fish was caught through all methods. Lakes Beaver, Tracy, Montaubois and St-Onge were not sampled with the transect method.
Table S9 - Observed lake-scale fish community prevalence estimated by each method.
All values are given in percentage. Lake Tracy was not included because only one fish was caughted through all methods. NAs mean that the lake was not sampled with the corresponding method.
Table S8 - Observed landscape-scale fish community prevalence estimated by each method.
All values are given in percentage.
Figure A2 - Comparaison de méthodes pour l’estimation de la prévalence d’infection chez Lepomis gibbosus dans le paysage à travers un gradient croissant d’effort d’échantillonnage.
Les points indiquent la prévalence moyenne pour un nombre d’échantillons (N) choisis aléatoirement. Les zones ombragées représentent l’intervalle de confiance à 95% sur la courbe de tendance de type « loess ».
Table S14 - Transect sites water and habitat characteristics.
The results are grouped by lake.
Table S7 - References of the black spot disease occurrence in the fish species sampled our study system.
*Ameiurus nebulosus* and *Esox masquinongy* have no mention of black spot disease. This table is not an exhaustive review.
Table S6 - Mean species length within each lake sampled across the different sampling method.
Lake Tracy was omitted because of only one sampled fish.
Table S5 - Mean fish species length in the landscape across the different sampling methods.
Table S4 - Abundance of fish species in the 15 sampled lakes across the different sampling methods.
**C** stands for combined methods, **MT** for minnow trap, **S** for seine net and **T** for transect. NAs mean that the lake was not sampled with the according method.
Figure S1 - Correlation plot of significant site-scale environmental predictors.
Table S3 - Fishing gear dimensions
Table S2 - Determination of the sampling effort within lakes according to the lake area.
Table S1 - Geographical and morphometric lake characteristics of the 15 lakes sampled.