hello

Prelim semantic similarity analysis

N = 188; box_percent, change_percent, and eccentricity added to model.

New analyses

N = 173; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating and change type; Random effects: workerId, image, and type of change

N = 85; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating; Random effects: workerId and image; Only one type of change (disappear).

N = 50; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating and change type; Random effects: workerId and image

N = 22; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating and change type; Random effects: workerId and image

N = 154; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating and change type; Random effects: workerId, image, and type of change

N = 71; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating; Random effects: workerId and image; Only one type of change (disappear).

N = 49; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating and change type; Random effects: workerId and image

N = 21; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating and change type; Random effects: workerId and image

N = 16; Raw and log RTs; Fixed effects: likelihood rating and change type; Random effects: workerId and image

N = 83; detection_rt ~ likelihood_rating; random effects: worker ID, image, stimulus set, and type of change

N = 47; detection_rt ~ likelihood_rating; random effects: worker ID, image, and type of change

N = 20; detection_rt ~ likelihood_rating; random effects: worker ID, image, and type of change

N = 16; detection_rt ~ likelihood_rating; random effects: worker ID, image, and type of change

Combining data from Rensink, Ma, and Wolfe1 stimulus sets; N = 75 subjs, 227 images

N = 37

N = 22

Combining data from Rensink, Ma, and Wolfe1 stimulus sets

N = 28

N = 10

N = 16

Original sample consisted of 127 subjects. Subjects were excluded if (1) performance on matching task was at or below chance, (2) if median RT on matching task was at or below 200 ms, and (3) if IB counting error rate was greater than 40%. Final sample contained 52 subjects. There are 3 logistic regressions with median RT, accuracy, and both as predictors. Three additional regressions control for IB error with same predictors.

Accuracy as covariate

Original sample consisted of 127 subjects. Subjects were excluded if they performed at or below chance on matching task, if median RT is at or below 200 ms on matching task, and if they missed one or both catch trials in the line judgment task. Final sample contained 65 subjects. There are 12 logistic regressions. Median RT, accuracy, and both are used as predictors; Outcome is whether subject noticed a shape (in general), noticed a shape in the correct location, noticed the square, and noticed the square in the correct location.

Subjects excluded with 50% or less accuracy on embedded and matching tasks and with greater than 20% error on counting task. Subjects are categorized as noticers or non-noticers by AJB.

Subjects excluded based on accuracy on matching/embedded tasks and percent error on counting task

lmer modeling

lmer modeling

63 MTurk subjects

Excluded subjects with poor performance on matching and/or embedded figures task. Sona (N = 18) and MTurk (N = 36/31).

Sona (N = 18), MTurk (N = 36), and combined (N=54); Continuous (ratio) and dichotomous (cognitive style) predicting IB. With and without MTurk outlier

N = 18

Raw RTs, log RTs, and cycles

Raw RTs, log RTs, and cycles

N = 14

N = 10

N = 36; change/no-change catch trials; 500 ms fixation before response window

N = 36; change/no-change catch trials

Two sets of analyses with 58 and 57 subjects

Two sets of analyses with 58 and 57 subjects

N = 36; correlations between catch, main trial, and no-change accuracies

N = 58; log-transformed RTs and linear modeling

N = 58

N = 50, w/ bootstrapping individual subjects

Only inaccurate trials removed

Subjects with less than 75% main trial accuracy and all inaccurate trials removed

Only inaccurate trials removed

Only inaccurate trials removed

Only inaccurate trials removed

N = 34

N = 16

Subjects with less than 75% main trial accuracy and all inaccurate trials removed

Subjects with less than 75% main trial accuracy and all inaccurate trials removed

Subjects with less than 75% main trial accuracy and all inaccurate trials removed